Which of the following is an example of pragmatic reasoning?

Pragmatic reasoning involves understanding the context in which therapy occurs, including social aspects and practical constraints. This type of reasoning focuses on how external factors influence therapy and the interactions between the therapist and client. By asking who referred the client and why, the practitioner is considering important contextual elements that can affect treatment. This includes understanding the motivations behind the referral and the expectations that the referring party may have, which can influence how therapy is approached and the relationship between the client and therapist.

The other options tend to center around more theoretical aspects of therapy or the client's individual characteristics, rather than practical considerations of context and setting. For instance, relating to the client is important for rapport but doesn’t capture the pragmatic reasoning that factors in external influences. Similarly, discussing expected outcomes or scientifically supported interventions focuses more on the content of therapy rather than the contextual influences that shape the therapeutic environment and experience.